WVU Part School Image
In the job markets, employers determine the suitability of successful applicants and seekers of various professions according to analyzed factors. The factors in consideration differ from the academic excellence, skill level, reputation of the institutions attended, expertise gained, and the level of experience in the respective field of specialization. Added concern is leveled on the institution’s image as well as its record of accomplishment on exemplary performance over the years. In the latter, a source of prestige is enabled in the stakeholders as well as the entire organization. According to the author’s take on WVU’s party school image, he states that it negatively affects the school. The claim on WVU party school image does not substantially offer a valid reason for employer’s snub in the job market.
The author categorically looks at the definitive image presented by the WVU party. In the defense, the author states that the degrees offered in the institution appear to be of lesser value to the employers as compared to the rest or peer-like institutions. With the analysis and counter-reaction offered from past graduates, a symbolic trend as observed by the author is depicted. He states that in the present circumstances, employers also pay attention to the perception of institutions by the public when assessing the applications of jobs and credentials. It is in this regard that the author seeks to affirm the negativity presented by the party image.
In the sociological analyses of the job market, current trends and statistical evidences form part of the selection and subsequent approval of the employers. The author enhances the claim by researching on candidates’ assessment, interviews carried out between the respective employers and the graduates from the mentioned school. With majority of the statistics pointing to a dismal succession, rate at the job markets, the author feels vindicated to blame the school’s image on the turn of events. The party image according to him is responsible for the woes and perception. In turn, he farther urges a considerable uptake of measures to counter the trend especially for interested students already in the system.
However, with the author’s claim on the presented image, it is of value to disagree respectfully. Indeed, the perception of an institution forms part of the crucial elements ion assessment of graduates, but it contains a slight importance. Current sociological studies point out that employers carry out cognitive analysis of various factors in the job markets before accepting and absorbing the concerned persons. Of the aforementioned qualities required, experience, skill-level, academic qualification and relevance of the realistic approach top the lists. The suitability of a successful applicant and graduate through enabled practical means helps human resource personnel in taking up an employee. Thus, a student with relevant academic qualification, experience, and required work-like attributes will be absorbed with lesser concern on perception of the school.
WVU party image according to the author, presents a negative stereotype to the student’s success of application to jobs by the employers does not hold substantial reason according to the current trends in the job market. Employers determine the suitability of successful applicants and seekers of various professions according to analyzed factors like academic excellence, skill level, expertise gained and the level of experience in the respective field of specialization. The demeaning value of the degrees being looked down upon by employers is minimal.